Breaking and in‑depth news for Winthrop, MA

Storm cuts power, then water, in Winthrop

A heavy winter storm caused chaos and distress across Winthrop on Monday, with 15 inches of snow and 60 mph wind gusts magnified by widespread power outages that took down water supplies for large sections of town and exacerbated questions about its utility preparations.

The storm came one month after Winthrop was hit with about two feet of snow, though this week’s duration, wind effects and extended outages suggested the possibility of longer-lasting effects on the town and its residents.

The storm knocked out electricity to about a quarter of Winthrop’s 8,500 households, making it one of the most heavily affected communities in the Boston area. Those outages in turn were blamed for triggering several instances of outages in Winthrop’s water supply, which relies on the power system for its operation.

Inexcusable delays

The results included several inches of water inside houses in the area surrounding Girdlestone Road – already one of the town’s hardest-hit areas in terms of ongoing flooding – and water along the streets.

“This is just inexcusable as far as I’m concerned,” one of the affected residents, Mark Sennott, said in appearances on local television stations. “This is infrastructure that should have been fixed decades upon decades ago,” Mr Sennott said. “I’m fed up with it.”

The damage in the area included a sinkhole that broke open on Marshall Street, blamed on one of the water main breaks, that trapped a truck from the town’s Department of Public Works as it was plowing.

The Town Council president, James Letterie, issued a statement during the storm declaring a state of emergency, noting the town “will require and request state resources” to help in managing the storm.

State role

The town, in two separate statements, also noted multiple water main breaks and attributed them to the power loss, which it said also affected about 1,500 homes in Winthrop. And it announced the opening of a warming center at the Arthur T. Cummings Elementary School for anyone needing it.

Beyond the written statements, however, town leaders did not respond to requests for comments on the situations. One member of the Town Council, Max Tassinari – who stood on opposite sides of Mr Sennott and Mr Letterie as they both fought town compliance with the state’s 3A law and castigated Mr Tassinari’s support for it – expressed broad agreement with Mr Sennott’s concern about the storm revealing failed priorities.

Mr Tassinari, an at-large member of the council, said the storm showed that the town’s public works, fire and police departments “continue to overdeliver in every circumstance,” adding: “They responded as fast as possible to address water, power and heating issues across town amidst a record-breaking blizzard.” But the damages in the Girdlestone area, Mr Tassinari said, show the mistake of the town fighting the state over the 3A issue and missing out on some $15 million in state funding that could have been used to help with flooding and drainage problems.

“If the town had moved on the known drainage issues at Girdlestone with that available state funding at any time in the last eight years, we wouldn’t have had that level of catastrophe today,” Mr Tassinari said. “Instead we spent two years fighting against the state and still have limited access to funding because the town chooses to treat the state as an adversary instead of a partner.”

Key area

The Girdlestone Road neighborhood already had been subject to repeated flooding that earned it the distinction of being named by the town’s Citizens Advisory Commission on Climate as one of Winthrop’s locations most vulnerable to rising sea levels. The commission said the area needed new protections that included walls and pumps, but it suspended its work after accusing the Town Council of failing to obtain necessary funding while hindering state cooperation through Winthrop’s rejection of the 3A housing law.

The storm hit harder to the immediate south of Boston and Winthrop, with winds reaching 80 mph and snowfall totals nearing three feet. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey issued a travel ban for Bristol, Plymouth, Barnstable and Dukes counties, and sent 200 members of the state’s National Guard to assist with the response. About 290,000 power customers lost service statewide.

In Winthrop, the power outages were largely in the areas of Point Shirley and the Central Business District extending out to the Highlands. The water outages were then triggered by the loss of power to the instruments that control the water system’s pressure relief valve stations, opening the valves, the Winthrop town manager, Anthony Marino, said in his written explanation of the situation.

“This resulted in a pressure spike that led to numerous water main breaks, including in the areas of Marshall Street, Veterans Road, Beal Street, and additional locations,” Mr Marino said. For a brief time, he said, the town shut all water service in Winthrop. The DPW truck was removed from the Marshall Street hole in the early afternoon, and much of the power was restored by early evening.

2 responses to “Storm cuts power, then water, in Winthrop”

  1. crispy8ab0352550 Avatar
    crispy8ab0352550

    The right thing to do was follow the recommendations from the Citizens Advisory Commission on Climate. The easy thing to do was rising hell over a rezoning law.

    Like

  2. agile3d8812d953 Avatar
    agile3d8812d953

    I take exception to the Pilot’s editorial politicking and indiscriminate use of a natural disaster to further their own agenda. Councilor Tassinari’s claim that Winthrop “lost out on $15 million in state aid” for drainage and flooding mitigation on Girdlestone Road because of the Town’s opposition to the MBTA Communities Act (Section 3A) is, at best, a misleading oversimplification and, at worst, a legally and factually unsupported assertion.

    First, the MBTA Communities Act, G.L. c. 40A, §3A, does not itself appropriate or earmark specific capital funds for localized infrastructure projects such as stormwater drainage improvements. Rather, it conditions eligibility for certain competitive state grant programs on compliance status. Eligibility, however, is not entitlement. There is no automatic $15 million award tied to Section 3A compliance, and no documented commitment from the Commonwealth guaranteeing such a sum to Winthrop for the Girdlestone Road drainage issue.

    Second, any suggestion that a specific infrastructure project was definitively forfeited presumes (1) that Winthrop had applied for a qualifying grant, (2) that the application would have been approved, and (3) that the award amount would have equaled the cited $15 million. Those are three independent contingencies, none of which are publicly substantiated. Competitive capital grants are awarded based on project readiness, engineering, cost-benefit analysis, and statewide prioritization—not solely municipal zoning compliance.

    Third, framing the matter as a direct causal loss ignores the unsettled legal and policy landscape surrounding Section 3A enforcement. Multiple municipalities, including Winthrop, have raised legitimate statutory, constitutional, and planning concerns regarding the Act’s scope, implementation guidance, and its tension with local zoning autonomy under Massachusetts law. Exercising the right to challenge or seek clarification of state mandates is not “opposition” in a vacuum; it is a lawful municipal response to a sweeping zoning directive with long-term land use, infrastructure, and fiscal consequences.

    Fourth, the flooding and drainage problems in the Girdlestone Road area are longstanding infrastructure issues tied to coastal conditions, stormwater capacity, and capital planning cycles that predate the enactment of Section 3A. Suggesting that compliance with a zoning statute would have singularly resolved or funded these engineering challenges conflates land use density policy with capital drainage infrastructure funding streams, which are typically addressed through municipal capital budgets, state earmarks, hazard mitigation programs, or federal resilience grants.

    Finally, public discourse should distinguish between speculative funding eligibility and actual, secured appropriations. Unless and until there is documentary evidence that the Commonwealth specifically offered—and Winthrop definitively lost—a $15 million drainage grant solely due to its Section 3A position, the assertion remains conjectural. Responsible governance requires precision, not hypothetical accounting of funds that were neither awarded nor guaranteed.

    In sum, Winthrop did not “lose” a defined $15 million infrastructure grant. At most, the Town’s ongoing policy and legal posture regarding the MBTA Communities Act may affect its eligibility for certain discretionary programs, subject to application, evaluation, and award. Presenting that conditional and uncertain process as a concrete forfeiture of funds misstates both the law and the facts.

    Frederick Dillon Bagley

    Like

Leave a reply to agile3d8812d953 Cancel reply

About

Winthrop Pilot is an independent newspaper for Winthrop, MA. It has no affiliation with any other news organization. The editors can be reached at winthrop-pilot@proton.me